|
|
Partially
Etched Through Channel (PETC) Pins
Features,
Advantages and Benefits of PETC Pins
The
shape and dimensions of the pin tip features affect the size,
number, shape and volume of the printed spots and thereby exert
a pronounced effect on the size, uniformity, and the number of
spots that can be printed per sample uptake. PETC
pins offer several advantages over the classic pin designs, including
improved control over the size and uniformity of printed samples
through manipulation of dimensions and geometry of the channel
that connect the pin reservoir and the tip surface. By altering
the shape of the PETCs, pins can be engineered with larger internal
volume capacity, greater mechanical strength, easier ability to
be cleaned and decreased susceptibility to clogging. The result
of these improvements is a printing tool with extremely precise
metering of fluid dispensation with a mechanically strengthened
print tip, which will allow , DNA or protein microarrays of improved
spot quality and quantity to be produced at a lower cost. Table
1 lists some of the features and advantages that can be obtained
using PETC pins.
Table1
Features, advantages and Benefits of the PETC pin designs
Pin
feature
|
Advantages
|
PETCs |
Control
amount of fluid delivered per spot by controlling the size
and shape of the channels connecting the reservoirs and the
print tips. |
Closed
reservoirs |
Slow
evaporation rate of sample during printing leading to more
uniform spots due to reduced effect of concentration change
in the printing solution during the course of the printing. |
Multiple
channels |
a)
Elimination of missing spots as plugging of one channel will
not affect the fluid delivery of other channels; b) More uniform
spots due to uniform delivery of fluid by many smaller channels
as compared to one big channel |
Multiple
reservoirs |
Larger
sample volume uptake; more number of deliverable spots per
each uptake. |
Print
tip is one piece instead of two |
Stronger
print tip will maintain original shape longer than open capillary
pins thereby giving more uniform spots during a longer pin
lifetime. |
Printing
Performance of PETC Pins
The
performance of PETC pins was evaluated by printing DNA microarrays
and comparing them to arrays printed with the classic, open capillary
Si pins. For a given pin tip size and uptake volume, the PETC
designs delivered smaller spots, larger number of spots, and greater
spot-to-spot uniformity as compared to the open capillary pins.
One of the factors that influence the spot size and reproducibility
is the narrow width of the PETC as it exits the pin shaft onto
the print tip, which acts analogously to a flow restrictor in
that it mediates the flow between the reservoir and the print
tip. The data in Figs. 4, 5 and 6 illustratethe dramatic effect
on spot size induced by the size and shape of the channel as it
exits onto the print tip. The smaller the PETC channel dimension
as it enters the print tip, the smaller and more uniform are the
spots that result. As shown in Fig. 5, the combination of four
reservoirs and a m PETC can give as many as 2000 spots from a
single source plate visit. Fig. 6 shows the plot which compares
the spot size profile of the three arrays shown in Fig. 4.
Click
on the images to see an enlarged view
Fig.
4 Scanned microarray images of Cy3 labeled 9-mers in
3x SSC printed from a single uptake volume using silicon
pins having a tip size of 75x75µm with various channel.
The spots are printed on a 180µm spot pitch and the width
and depth of the channels near the pin tips are 15µm x 75µm
(left), 10µm x 35µm (middle), and 2µm x 75µm (right). As
can be seen from the above images the spot uniformity and
number of spots increases with the decrease in channel size.
|
Fig.
5 Scanned image of an
array of ~2000 spots prined from a single uptake volume.
Spot pitch: 180µm, tip size:75µm x 75µm.
|
Fig. 6 A plot of spot size and coefficient
of variance for groups of first 100, 200, 300 and 400
spots printed with three different types of pins all of which
have 75µm
x 75µm
print tips
It
is interesting to note that there is a strong effect from the
size of the channel connecting the reservoir on the deposited
spot size. A commonly held misconception is that somehow during
microcontact printing, the printing fluid deposited onto the substrate
from the pin's print tip which is parallel to the substrate. A
cursory analysis shows that there is not nearly enough fluid on
the print tip surface to account for the deposited drop volume.
For example, even if the film of printing fluid adhering to the
surface of the print tip that is parallel to the substrate is
1µm thick and the print tip is 75µm x 75µm , there are only about
5 pL of printing fluid on the print tip. However, based on the
number of spots obtained per dip of the pin, the deposited spot
volume of a printing fluid like random cy3-labeled 9-mers in 3X
SSC on amine coated glass slides is closer to 200-300 pL. Therefore,
the printing fluid on the pin's print tip is only a few percent
of the total deposited drop volume.
Since there is not nearly enough fluid adhering to the print
tip to account for the observed spot volume, the deposited volume
must originate from within the fluid filled channel connecting
the print tip. Furthermore, most of the deposited spot volume
is removed from the channel as the pin is drawn away from the
substrate. In other words, the wettable substrate surface draws
the fluid from the pin shaft as the pin is withdrawn away from
the surface. Further support for this mechanism is provided
by study the printing behavior of a pin in which there is a
thin (<10µm ) film of silicon directly on the print tip and
parallel to the surface of the substrate (i.e. connecting the
tips of the two prongs of the split pin shaft together). Even
though photomicrographs show the entire print tip to be covered
with a thin film of water, this type of pin will not print multiple
spots - presumably due to the inability of the substrate to
remove the printing fluid from the channel because of the silicon
separator between the channel and substrate.The improved design
manifests itself in more spots printed per source plate visit
and a substantially higher pin to pin uniformity. Table 2 compares
the printing parameters and spot size uniformity for two different
PETC pin tips to a classic pin tip with the same tip size and
uptake volume.
Table
2 Comparison
of arrays printed with Si Pins having 75µm x 75µm tip size
(Arrays are printed on one slide in test print mode)
Channel
dimensions near pin tip
(channel width x channel depth)
|
PETC
2 µm x 35µm
|
PETC
10 µm x 35µm
|
Classic
channels
15 µm x 75µm
|
Average
spot diameter |
90µm
|
100µm
|
110µm
|
%
CV (for the first 250 spots) |
2%
|
5%
|
6%
|
Total
number of spots per one dip |
700-800
|
600-700
|
400-500
|
Volumetric
uptake |
~0.125µL
|
~0.125µL
|
~0.125µL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright
© 2000-2007 Parallel Synthesis Technologies, Inc. All
Rights Reserved.
3054 Lawrence Expy. Santa Clara, CA 95051
info@parallel-synthesis.com, Phone:(408) 749-8318 Fax:(408) 749-8318
|